Wednesday, March 10, 2010
National Strategy Forum
 
 
 
Strategic Challenges Near and Far

Volume 18, Issue 3

August 2009 Publisher's Note


The United States and Mexico: Mutual Problems, Joint Solutions
The following five essays discuss many of the challenges that the United States and Mexico face in coordinating effective border policies.  The goal is to elucidate the many areas where more cooperation and tighter joint strategies are needed by both countries to achieve their national goals.

Reasons of State that Sustain Mexico’s Strategy Against Organized Crime
Eduardo Medina-Mora

The Mexico-United States Border: A Fragmented Agenda
Luis Herrera-Lasso M.

The Mérida Initiative: A New Security Cooperation Partnership
David T. Johnson

Mexico’s Strategy
Iñigo Guevara Moyano

Mexico's Polity and Economy: Security vs. Progress and Our Failed Integration
José Luis Valdés-Ugalde

Special Report:
American Foreign Policy Toward Pakistan
Frank Schell, Richard E. Friedman, and Lauren Bean

Regions at a Glance:
War in Afghanistan: Achieving a Successful Civilian Surge
Catherine Dale

NSF Insider Views:
Trying Terrorists
Richard E. Friedman

The Iranian and North Korean Nuclear Programs and International Law
John Allen Williams

Speaker Summary:
Ilan Berman and Winning the Long War
Eric S. Morse

Download and Print the entire Fall 2009 issue in PDF format.



 

 

For many years, the objective of the National Strategy Forum (NSF) has been to provide balanced, nonpartisan, usable information regarding US national strategy and national security. The NSF created an informal "curriculum" based on the Forum monthly lecture series, the National Strategy Forum Review (NSFR) publication, and conferences on emerging national strategy/security issues. The results have been positive -- NSF members are exceptionally well-informed.

The velocity, access, and availability of an enormous amount of information tend to overwhelm careful analysis. Particularly troublesome are some blogs, which are unedited and unscreened, and, frequently, highly partisan. Confusing, inconsistent, misleading and incomplete information interferes with rational analysis. The NSF has adapted to this new milieu.

We seek to provide NSF members with an overview of the national strategy/national security field in summary form, while carefully avoiding superficial treatment. We will continue to adhere to our long-standing principle of "framing the issues," and asking questions rather than answering them. Context will be provided by a wide array of experts in their respective fields.

The major themes that the NSF has focused on are diplomacy, economics, military force, rule of law, strategy, and terrorism. These themes will continue with different emphasis depending upon facts on the ground. It is likely that the economy will receive high priority attention. Strategy will continue to be the glue that ties these interdependent themes together.

NSF members will have a matrix of themes and issues that will assist them in becoming well-informed and well-positioned to discuss these issues with their family, friends, business associates, and civic associates.

        - Richard E. Friedman, Publisher


 

 



About the National Strategy Forum Review

The National Strategy Forum Review is a quarterly publication of the National Strategy Forum, a Chicago not-for-profit, non-partisan US national security research and education institute.

Richard E. Friedman
,
Publisher

John Allen Williams, Editor

Lauren Bean, Managing Editor

Eric S. Morse, Editorial Assistant

Editorial Board
John Allen Williams
Marilyn Diamond
Frank Schell
Endy Zemenides

© 2009 National Strategy Forum, Inc.

Permission granted to use the text herein, subject to appropriate attribution and notification.

 



Privacy Statement   |  Terms Of Use
Login     

Copyright (c) 1983 - 2009 by National Strategy Forum